<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Merriam-Webster on cladistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roberto.kellerperez.com/2010/06/merriam-webster-on-cladistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roberto.kellerperez.com/2010/06/merriam-webster-on-cladistics/</link>
	<description>Ant reconstruction one homology at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Keller</title>
		<link>http://roberto.kellerperez.com/2010/06/merriam-webster-on-cladistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1546</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roberto.kellerperez.com/?p=2128#comment-1546</guid>
		<description>In the context of the definition &quot;not found in ancestral groups&quot; clarifies that the shared characteristics must be unique to the taxon been defined. Plesiomorphies won&#039;t do for example. I can live with that.

The date refers to the paper by Ernst Mayr where he first used the term &lt;em&gt;cladistics&lt;/em&gt; to label Hennig&#039;s phylogenetic systematics:
Mayr, E. 1965. Numerical phenetics and taxonomic theory. &lt;em&gt;Systematic Zoology&lt;/em&gt; 14:73-97.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the context of the definition &#8220;not found in ancestral groups&#8221; clarifies that the shared characteristics must be unique to the taxon been defined. Plesiomorphies won&#8217;t do for example. I can live with that.</p>
<p>The date refers to the paper by Ernst Mayr where he first used the term <em>cladistics</em> to label Hennig&#8217;s phylogenetic systematics:<br />
Mayr, E. 1965. Numerical phenetics and taxonomic theory. <em>Systematic Zoology</em> 14:73-97.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Brazeau</title>
		<link>http://roberto.kellerperez.com/2010/06/merriam-webster-on-cladistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1544</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Brazeau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roberto.kellerperez.com/?p=2128#comment-1544</guid>
		<description>You find? I see it as problematic for one reason: the use of the term &quot;ancestral groups&quot;. In other words: paraphyletic groups.

At any rate, it appears to claim that the date of entry was in 1965. That&#039;s a very interesting date for the term to have been introduced to an English dictionary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You find? I see it as problematic for one reason: the use of the term &#8220;ancestral groups&#8221;. In other words: paraphyletic groups.</p>
<p>At any rate, it appears to claim that the date of entry was in 1965. That&#8217;s a very interesting date for the term to have been introduced to an English dictionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

