Three succinct reasons why scientists should communicate science to the general public
Raghavendra Gadagkar, social insects biologist, writes:
I believe that most working scientists should spend part of their time explaining and discussing their work with a larger audience. There are at least three important reasons for this. One is that science needs to become an integral and essential part of society and not be perceived as an outside force that is at loggerheads with society. Second, scientists need to recruit the best young minds to make up the next generation and that can only happen if we devote time to communicate with the general public. Third, I have no doubt it will help us appreciate our own work better.
From the book review of Keller, L. & Gordon, É. 2009: The lives of ants. – Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, XI + 252 pp.1
- That would be the other Keller, mind you. ↩
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Search
Recent Comments
Tags
Blogroll
- 2D Goggles
- Ant Blog
- antbase
- Apoica
- Catalogue of Organisms
- Computer cladistics / ¡Cladística a la lata!
- Creature Cast
- Evolving Thoughts
- HAO
- Historias de hormigas
- I Love Insects
- iPhylo
- Macromite’s Blog
- Myrmecoid
- Myrmecos Blog
- myrmician
- Pharyngula
- Photo Synthesis
- SciencePunk
- Sifolinia’s AntBlog
- Systematics and Biogeography
- The Ant Room
- The Dragonfly Woman
- The Lancelet
- The Rough Guide to Evolution
- Vince Smith blogs
Links
- Abouheif Lab

- Ant Genomics

- antweb.org
- Asociación Ibérica de Mirmecología
- Biodiversity Heritage Library
- Comparative Morphology & Development (CSZ)
- filogenética.org
- formicidae.org
- International Society of Hymenopterists
- Miller Lab – Insect Systematics
- Morphbank
- MorphoBank
- Plazi
- Richard Dawkins
- Social Wasps
- Systematics Association
- TNT wiki
- Willi Hennig Society
- ZooBank




